Tehran: Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has strongly rejected a recent statement issued by the Group of Seven (G7) countries, labeling it as blatant interference in Iran’s internal affairs and asserting that there is irrefutable evidence of Israel’s involvement in violence and terrorism inside Iran. The Iranian government accused the G7 of double standards on human rights and of using the issue as a political tool under US leadership.
In an official statement, the Iranian Foreign Ministry said that recent unrest in the country, which it described as initially peaceful protests, was deliberately turned violent by “Zionist-backed terrorist elements.” According to the statement, these groups carried out coordinated attacks against demonstrators and security personnel between January 8 and January 10, resulting in casualties and widespread disorder.
The ministry claimed that evidence clearly points to the involvement of Israel in acts of violence and terrorism during this period. It further alleged that statements made by American and Israeli officials amounted to explicit incitement to violence, serving as proof of external orchestration and support for unrest within Iran.
Iranian officials emphasized that the Islamic Republic respects the right to peaceful protest and remains committed to protecting citizens’ constitutional rights. The Foreign Ministry said that Iran’s constitution guarantees civil liberties and that the state is obligated to ensure public safety and maintain law and order. At the same time, it stressed that Iran would firmly defend its national security against terrorism allegedly backed and sponsored from abroad.
“The Iranian state will fully uphold its responsibility to protect citizens and preserve public order,” the statement said, adding that any acts of violence or terrorism linked to foreign sponsorship would be dealt with decisively. The ministry reiterated that peaceful protest should not be exploited as a cover for what it described as organized violence and sabotage.
Responding directly to the G7 statement, the Iranian Foreign Ministry said that comments by the group regarding Iran’s internal situation were “interventionist and unlawful.” It accused the G7, led by the United States, of hypocrisy and selective concern when it comes to human rights, arguing that the group has a long record of serious human rights violations both domestically and internationally.
The statement claimed that the G7’s credibility on human rights has been severely undermined by its policies and actions, particularly its support for Israel. According to the Iranian Foreign Ministry, G7 countries are “directly complicit” in what it described as the genocide of the Palestinian people, due to their political, military, and diplomatic backing of Israel.
Iranian officials said that countries involved in or supporting such actions have no moral authority to lecture others on human rights. The statement added that the Iranian nation would not forget civilian casualties caused by Israeli attacks in 2025, describing them as crimes that remain etched in public memory.
The Foreign Ministry also criticized the use of human rights as a political weapon, arguing that the G7 selectively applies human rights principles to pressure and destabilize countries that resist Western influence. It called on the G7 to end what it described as illegal interference in Iran’s domestic affairs and to lift unilateral and unlawful sanctions imposed on the country.
According to the statement, encouraging or justifying violence and terrorism under the banner of human rights is unacceptable and contradicts the very principles the G7 claims to uphold. Iran urged the group to adopt a more responsible and lawful approach in international relations and to respect the sovereignty of independent states.
The Iranian Foreign Ministry further reiterated Tehran’s longstanding position that dialogue, mutual respect, and non-interference should form the basis of international engagement. It stressed that external pressure, sanctions, and political statements aimed at influencing domestic affairs only exacerbate tensions and undermine stability.
The statement also underscored Iran’s view that Western countries, particularly those within the G7, have consistently ignored or downplayed violations committed by their allies, while aggressively criticizing countries they oppose. This, Iran argued, has exposed what it sees as the double standards and politicization of human rights discourse at the global level.
The sharp response from Tehran comes amid heightened tensions between Iran and Western countries over a range of issues, including regional security, sanctions, and human rights. Relations have remained strained, with Iran frequently accusing the United States and its allies of pursuing policies aimed at weakening the country through economic pressure and political isolation.
Analysts note that Iran’s rejection of the G7 statement reflects a broader pattern of confrontation between Tehran and Western powers, particularly over narratives surrounding internal unrest and regional conflicts. Iranian officials have repeatedly blamed foreign actors, especially Israel and the United States, for fomenting instability, while Western governments accuse Iran of suppressing dissent and violating human rights.
Despite these tensions, Iranian authorities insist that stability and security inside the country remain under control and that the state is capable of addressing challenges without external interference. The Foreign Ministry concluded its statement by reaffirming Iran’s commitment to defending its sovereignty, national security, and constitutional order.
In conclusion, Iran’s forceful rejection of the G7 statement highlights deep divisions between Tehran and Western powers over issues of human rights, regional conflict, and sovereignty. By accusing Israel of direct involvement in violence inside Iran and criticizing the G7 for what it calls hypocrisy and interference, the Iranian government has once again drawn a sharp line against external pressure, signaling that it will continue to resist what it views as politicized and interventionist approaches under the guise of human rights.
