American media reports have claimed that Iran is showing willingness to halt uranium enrichment activities and transfer its highly enriched uranium stockpile outside the country, in what could mark a major shift in its nuclear policy.
According to reports attributed to U.S. officials and sources close to the White House, Washington and Tehran are reportedly closer to a potential agreement than at any point since the escalation of recent tensions. A one-page memorandum of understanding (MoU) is said to have been prepared, outlining a framework for ending hostilities and restarting formal nuclear negotiations.
The reports suggest that senior U.S. officials, including advisers close to former President Donald Trump such as Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, are engaged in ongoing direct and indirect communications with Iranian representatives through mediators.
Key points of the reported draft agreement
According to the claims, the proposed framework includes several major provisions:
- End of hostilities: A formal announcement to end the conflict would be made immediately upon signing the MoU.
- 30-day negotiation window: Detailed talks on sanctions relief and Iran’s nuclear program would take place within 30 days in either Islamabad or Geneva.
- Maritime tensions: Restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz, including naval blockades and shipping disruptions, would be gradually lifted during this period.
- Uranium enrichment limits: Iran is reportedly considering suspending uranium enrichment for 12 to 15 years, while the U.S. is said to be pushing for a 20-year freeze.
- Transfer of enriched uranium: One of the most significant reported elements is Iran’s alleged willingness to move its highly enriched uranium out of the country, possibly to the United States, marking a major departure from its previous stance.
In return, the U.S. would reportedly release billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets and gradually ease sanctions imposed on Tehran.
Uncertainty and internal divisions
Despite the reported progress, officials acknowledge that significant uncertainties remain. According to White House sources, Iran’s leadership is currently divided into different internal factions, making it difficult to reach a unified decision.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has described the situation as “highly complex and technical,” while also expressing cautious optimism about a diplomatic solution. At the same time, he has criticized elements within the Iranian leadership, reflecting ongoing mistrust between the two sides.
Possibility of renewed escalation
The reports also indicate that no final agreement has been signed yet, and negotiations remain fragile. U.S. officials have reportedly warned that if talks fail, Washington retains the option to reimpose naval pressure in the region and resume military operations if necessary.
Broader implications
If confirmed, such an agreement would represent a major shift in regional geopolitics, particularly regarding Iran’s nuclear ambitions and U.S.-Iran relations. However, analysts caution that similar diplomatic breakthroughs in the past have often stalled due to political resistance and verification challenges.
